I MIX TAPES
For a number of years now I have been developing a tape mixing system
and a concurrent audio collage technique. The system is intended to function
as both a musical instrument and conceptual piece concerning obsolete
technology, recorded memory, and performance. A piece with which other
pieces are made. The system itself and the techniques used to play it
are my solution to what I see as “the physicality” or “liveness” problem
in sample based music and sound art.
The technique is very similar to a record LP DJ set up, with an analogue
sound source rhythmically skipped between several points, moments faded
between using a mixer developed specifically for speed and ease of switching. Because
of the re-recordable nature and blocky analogue characteristics of the
cassette, the result is a warmer more personal tone to the resulting
musical piece.
The system is set up so that there exists only a physical relationship
to the each sample, situated on its own specifically labeled tape.
The tapes are skipped back and forth using the crossfader to seamlessly
integrate the repeated chunks.
Digital technology has of course commercially developed this concept
into the suite of contemporary DJ software out there, where any sound
converted to MP3 format can be mixed together, looped, beatmatched and
processed.
This software has created new styles and genres of music, such as ‘the
mash-up’, and exploded possibilities for the remix as an art form.
My system could never approach the versatility of these programs.
But I aspire to a form of sample based expression that is “closer
to the bone”. The contemporary remix systems do not approach the
poetry and deftness of passion displayed by a physical system.
Artists such as Kid Koala, DJ Qbert, and the The X-Ecutioners brought
the application of physical skill and inspired human reaction to sample
based music and art. Christian Marclay pioneered the idea that each sample
source could be its own art object. The sample itself is a unique building
block, and the method of cataloguing and organizing them starkly effects
the outcome.
Even a sampler where the samples are loaded into numbered banks and
the parameters are on a digital read-out are too front-brain for me to
unlock the inner kingdom while playing.
I consider Sample based music to be a grand metaphor for our time now,
choked in conflicting messages and cancerously perpetrated content. The
juxtapositions and mindset that arises from encountering the vortex of
the mix perfectly illustrates how we are asked to live now, with every
message a link to another.
The samples and the technique I want to work with need to be more basic,
more primordial and transcendent than what flexes out of the latest software.
I need just slightly less mediation.
This is a DJ system for the breakdown of the world.
Coupled with a few basic effects (delay and reverb) and the new violin
of the post-digital era, the loop pedal, a variety of properly phantasmagoric
sonic effects and environemts can be achieved.
The literal definition of psychedelic is “mind opening”.
And through the re-experiance of repeated layered instants of sound I
feel like this can be achieved. |
|
WORK TAPES: The Music of Potentials
The tapes presented here are an example of the source
material in a compositional/performance system intent on unearthing sudden
mental and sonic interactions. The interest here is in the potential
composition presented by a group of sounds that relate alchemically through
me, rather than through the course of a desire or a concept mandated
composition. These tapes are usually jammed into a two-deck tape crossfader
mixing system and cut between rhythmically with a lot of "clicking and stopping".
With each tape physically embodying a thought or moment in my past,
I can create a manifestation of my mind in sound. Tapes work well for
this, due to many factors inherent in their design and history such
as awesome shittyness, durability against hitting and throwing, physical
love, likelihood of malfunction, instantaneousness expression , etc.
Each tape usually contains roughly three minutes of sound,
which provides a set beginning, middle, and ending minute. The sounds
are usually a collected improvisation, or bit of found sound or a field
recording or composed sequence or a personal moment, covert surveillance
or daily obscurity. Sounds are organized "in series" of 2 to
6 tapes, and identified by increasingly outlandish design elements, pictures,
colors, bits of hair, etc. Sonic differences within the series are evident
in the subtle differences in design ("this tape with the yellow
worms on it has harsher and pervy-er screaming on it than the tape with
the blue worms").
Also the color of the plastic relates to the year the tape was recorded
(any red tape is from 2001, any purple tape is from 2002-2003, etc.)
Tape designs attempt to turn them, and the sounds contained therein,
into sweet objects of affection, thus playing with my emotions as I choose
sounds for remixing (I hate the green tapes). The "amount
of chaos" can attempted to be oxymoronically controlled by cueing
or un-cueing the tapes before mixing, thus increasing the unknown nature
of each tape. By increasing amount known about each tape, you increases
the deftness and assuredly of the subsequent performance/composition,
thus decreasing surprise and spontaneity. By un-cueing (that is, never
cueing) and by establishing this overly complex, confusing, and personal
labeling system you decrease the deftness and musicality of the composition/performance
but stand to increase amount of magical surprise.
I believe this is the constant war in performance and
composition, the boundary between total aesthetic control (which can
lead to fabulous success or utter boredom and self indulgence) and spontaneity
(which can be a transcendent example of life or a muddled, insulting
shitpile) the boundary is between deft virtuoso experts who play technically
perfect crap and childlike, artbrut, savant know-nothings who achieve
sublime transcendence for the "wrong" reasons. Tapes are a
physical representation of sound and that physicality of recorded media
is why analogue is loved, why it is described as 'warm', as opposed to
digital, which is 'efficient'. Tapes are "bad". They
don't necessarily do what you want, but they may do what is necessary.
Also I realize I am unconsciously training myself so that I will still
be able to make art after the apocalypse comes "and the world is covered
in fire and blood and all the pretty computers have died."
I need the noise to control my reactions. To temper any
tendency toward paranoia and insanity. |
|
|
|